The author of this article is a doting
and loving father whose children were ‘stolen’ from him by a scheming
woman, aided and abetted by a well-known, family law solicitor - who
enjoys an almost professionally incestuous relationship with a sitting
judge - and a blatantly incompetent Social Services system.
The children were torn from a seafront
home, and plunged into a concrete, dope-dealing infested jungle, and
they became the playthings of an entirely corrupt antiquated legal
system. For fathers who have lost their children to scheming women,
this is your wakeup call.
I wish to dedicate this debate to
all children who have been deprived of a father’s love as a result
of scheming deceitful mother's who have made it their goal in life
to collect babies, by way of deception or otherwise. And who
deliberately use them as assets to fraudulently and emotionally
blackmail the welfare state, the judicial system, the social
services and the legal fraternity. And, who, with callous disregard
for the physiological well being of the children, willingly and
premeditatedly use them as weapons with which to provoke, to
antagonize and to vindictively and cruelly deprive their natural
fathers of being an equal part of their child's life.
Such mothers not only fraudulently
use, but are fully supported, financed and encouraged by the
mechanisms of the British legal system, solicitors, the police &
the Family Courts and the Social Services to do exactly what they
do. In a few words, they steal children and knowingly
psychologically abuse them in the process, and are rewarded for
doing so, at the expense of loving caring fathers, the children's
long term psychological well being, and every tax payer throughout
Britain.'
This debate has been born from on
going personal experiences and the soul-destroying nightmare that
many thousands of decent, caring loving fathers have to live with
every day. As a direct result of the legalized theft of their
children, by their deviously minded and vindictively motivated
ex-partners. Most of whom are often supported and encouraged by
like-minded associates who themselves are fully experienced with
having successfully achieved such deceptions.
And whose concept of parental morality
and understanding is about “one point away from being mentally
retarded.” And yet, they are very much aware of the fact that attain
a power equal to that of the Prime Minster, in that they all hold
the key to the safe of public funding, a bottomless pit of money
that is easily abused and easily unaccounted for. Perhaps, this
helps to explain why such mothers are on the daily shopping lists
and a desirable attraction to a certain class of solicitor. The one
who recognizes the bias against fathers in Family Law, and whose
sympathies and motivations are driven by their greed and fourteen
dollar minds.
Which begs the questions: how many
family relationships have been destroyed over the years, and how
many children have been robbed and deprived of a father’s love,
guidance and affection as a result of an unethical solicitors greed?
And who carries the great burden of guilt for the children who are
deprived of a fathers love: the angry confused lesser-minded mother,
or the unscrupulous highly intelligent solicitor who preys upon
them, the one who actively solicits and enthusiastically competes
for their trade.
Once snared, mothers of such a mind-
set are made fully aware of their powerful position within the bias
and flawed Family Law. A position that indirectly tells them that it
is all right to continue your hostility, and vindictiveness. And, it
is all right to continue using your children as an asset for fraud,
and a weapon with which to inflame and antagonize the children's
father, and to deprive him of any meaningful contact or involvement
with their children.
At this stage the unethical solicitor is
in complete control, as they fraudulently begin the process of
converting the vindictiveness, hostility and weakness of the
deceitful mother, into their own financial gain? And with total
disregard for the well-being of the children in
question.
My research has shown that all such
minded mothers are linked by a common thread, in that immediately
after their first meeting with their so-called family specialist
solicitor. They all, adhering to the advice they had been given,
adamantly refused to communicate with their ex-partners, even on
matters that are solely to do with their children. And they will
totally refuse to go to mediation, and make no effort whatsoever to
resolve the situation outside of the family courts.
At this point the question needs to
asked, 'Why, should a solicitor advise their client in such a way?’
Because in the interests of truth that solicitor well knows, even if
their lesser minded client doesn't, that such advice will inflame,
provoke and antagonize the emotions of the caring loving father, and
prolong the process, allowing the unethical solicitor to plunder the
purse of public funding of as much money as they possibly can.
And what could have been originally
solved within a mature adult conversation, with no real damage to
the children involved, becomes something that was never intended to
be, as a direct result of criminally and mercenary minded
solicitors.
Just one such circumstance cost the
tax payer many thousands of pounds, and inflicts irreparable damage
to the children's future stability and psychological well being.
This must surly be child abuse? And as a direct result, these
wounded and abused children may one day become the criminal or the
prisoner of the future. Let down by the law, and abused in the
process.
Like lambs to the slaughter such
minded mothers blindly surrender themselves to the superior will of
their solicitor. Abandoning their own parental responsibility and
any thought of what might be in the best interest of the children.
Their lesser minded mentality having been strengthened by what they
actually come to believe is the law, truth, wisdom and good advice
from their solicitor. This, of course, encourages them to adapt an
even more reckless disregard for the stability and psychological
well being of the children in question.
A tactic and conclusion they may
have intrinsically been capable of themselves as a direct result of
darkness within their own morality. Though the facts portray that in
all such cases, that they receive more than a little bit of help
from the low-life values of those around them. Who for whatever
unwholesome reasons wish to be a part of the same conspiracy.
But the ultimate responsibility rest
in the morality of the intelligently minded solicitor, controlling,
advising and representing them. My research has also clearly shown
that such mothers deliberately use this tactic for the purpose of
callously attempting to break the natural child father bond
relationship, a process which involves poisoning the minds of the
children against the father - surely be another form of child
abuse?
Many, many thousands of children
have been lost to the love, caring and guidance of their fathers as
a direct result of having been on the receiving end of blatant lies,
deceptions, and corrupt immoral Justice. The beginnings of which are
often created by callous, self-serving, deviously uncaring mothers,
who despite their lack of intellectual thought, feel confident in
the full knowledge that their crimes, the theft of children, and not
least their physiological abuse of the children involved, will be
sustained and legalized by the weakness and immorality of the Family
courts, and the fraudulent behaviour of those who control and
propose to represent the system.
When a scheming Mother’s deception
is endorsed and encouraged by the judiciary, the legal system and
the unethical mechanisms of the law that are intrinsically woven
into the fabric of the Family Courts, and into the ethos of certain
associated family solicitors, who claim some affiliation to
specialization in the area of dealing with disputes that involve
children, after the parents separate. This becomes a neon invitation
to any mother who wishes to collect another baby, to use as an asset
or a weapon for whatever purpose.
As a result of legalized deception
and unjust laws, countless fathers and children through no fault of
their own have been deprived of the love and caring of each other,
by fraudulent mothers who have themselves often been proven to be
prostitutes, crack cocaine addicts and, or good liars. Yet helped
and endorsed by the often sanctimonious and egocentric Judges who,
when challenged by a father with something that they don't want to
hear, are quick to say 'I will have you know that this is my court
room,' and go on to threaten with the hell fire and damnation of
being held in contempt of court. So What!
A Father either loves his children
or he doesn't, and for those who do such a threat is of no
consequence. The truth of the matter is that the court does not
belong to the judge, he is but a public servant.
Ownership of all British courts, whether
criminal, civil, or Family courts, belong to the tax payers of
Britain. It is they who finance the complete workings of the
judicial system from the cleaning of the toilets in the court
buildings, to the Judges salary. And despite what many may believe,
the Judge just like all the rest of us, even those who abuse it,
inherited the privilege of our judicial, legal and welfare system
from the efforts of every fallen
British soldier who gave their lives in
far flung battle fields, to ensure that every citizen within this
country has the right to justice, democracy and freedom.
So whatever judge maybe sitting on the
bench, it is worth remembering that he is just a man who has been
given the privileged custodianship to dispense the law in a fair and
impartial way, and despite what some may feel or sanctimoniously
believe, it is not their private domain, nor is it meant to be the
egocentric authoritarian position that some judges perceive it to
be.
The courts belong to the British people
past, present, and future!
Unfortunately biased family courts often
attract a particularly twisted-minded criminally-inclined breed of
attorney: 'Specialist Family Law Solicitors' who at will, without
question or challenge, fraudulently abuse the purse of Public
Funding (Tax Payers Money) by
deliberately manipulating their often less-educated clients into
giving them the key to the safe of public funding, under the false
pretence: ' Trust me, I'm on your side, and we will win, and don't
worry you will get what you want. Because the law will favour you'
Such unethical solicitors then go on to
deliberately inflame and to prolong the case, caring nothing about
the well being, stability or safety of the children involved, and,
who, in truth, are a profound danger to any children they pretend to
care about or posture to represent. Because their sole and only
motivation is to line their own pockets, and the bank accounts of
the firms they represent. At the expense of the children involved,
their loving fathers, human decency, just law, and every tax payer
in Britain.
In acknowledgment of all fathers who may
find themselves with having to battle with The Family Courts,
corrupt solicitors and vindictive mothers who use the system to
deprive them of the love of their child, and their child of the love
of their father ‘The New Criminologist’ will give you a platform
from which to directly challenge and confront those responsible.
Join in this new debate. Your voice will
help us to change these corrupt, unfair and unjust family laws. Your
story will be read by over one million people per week.
WE
WILL BE NAMING AND SHAMING THE GUILTY
http://www.newcriminologist.co.uk/
.gif){kind=logo}
