A Man who waved at his daughter
after a judge ordered him to have no contact, has been jailed for
ten months.
Mr X has made over 100
futile applications to the court - at an estimated cost of £300,000
to the British taxpayer, for reasonable contact with his
child.
The High Court Judge hearing the case has, once
again, ordered that there should be NO PUBLICITY. This order is
directed at the Press, Media and any form of electronic
communications (i.e.. Websites and e-mail). Anybody breaching this
order to the extent that the child may be identified will be open to
contempt charges and will almost certainly be sent to
prison.
The 'Gagging Order' is supposed to be in the
interests of the child but, anybody conversant with this case will
know that the child will NOT benefit from it. The only people who
will benefit are the so-called childcare professionals (including
the judges) who have been continually failing to protect the child's
interests since the case first began.
When are these
non-caring judges and other childcare professionals going to
recognise the fact that these poor children do NOT benefit by being
deprived of the parents and family members who love
them?
Your
Responses
Hello.
Reading the points about imprisoning a father for showing court
reports intrigues me. My ex wife and mother of our three children
only last august admitted to the court judge that she had shown the
two youngest (15 and 12 years old ) a copy of the welfare report and
social services report which contained details of her allegations
and accusations about me.
She also failed to point out that the reports questioned the
validity of her allegations, so the children do not know that they
are just allegations!! In effect she has traumatised them and
tainted their minds about me. When the judge discovered what she had
done what did he do? Nothing!!!! No prison sentence or any sort of
punishment for a flagrant contempt of the court!! He in summing up
admitted that she had gained an unfair advantage but still she won
the day.
BUT if I had done likewise would be probably be 1) in custody and
2) prevented from ever seeing the children again as I may
have corrupted them The law is discretionary and totally
unfair. Mothers seem able to flout laws and by being law breakers
they then become the law makers. Children are losing fathers to a
system which does not work.
regards Francis
Please Contact
P4p
with your responses to this article
.gif){kind=logo}
